From a recent FB post I made:
So ... the funny thing is ... as a certified slow learner it has recently dawned on me. Bicycling more than 12 hours isn't hard ... it's just dreadfully boring. Boring boring and boring.
Only two events were beyond my physical ability at that time. Race Across the West in 2010 (415 miles in 24 hrs) and the Race Around Ireland in 2017 (208 hours in about the same amount of time).
The rest ... I stopped because I ... just ... lost ... interest.
Funny it has taken this long for me to `get' that.
A sense of `relief' in some ways. Clearly there was a time when doing (or attempting) massive endurance cycling things was important. To `prove' my manhood? To show my capacity for doing extremely difficult physical and mental things? To employ an activity that consumed my anxious energy, grinding anxiety of existence. (No doubt about that last one).
For whatever reason I think I have the `grinding anxiety' under control. It's not so `grinding' at this point. And I don't think it has anything to do with age and the physiological realities of aging.
Over the next indeterminate period of time I'm going to see what substituting `intensity' for `volume' does for cycling satisfaction. It's definitely going to be difficult (it hurts to push the body into tempo pace for long periods of time).
1. A fourteen mile, 800 feet of climbing, out and back course (Kirkland-Canyon Out & Back) will serve as the `intensity' based training course;
2. One warm-up lap at average of 14.3 mph.
3. One or more `tempo' pace laps at no less than 15.5 mph.
And then see what that does in the way of physical stamina.
RESULTS:
Must have been a good day.
Lap 1: Goal 14.3 mph; Actual 15.2 mph
Lap 2: Goal 15.5 mph; Actual 17.5 mph.
Had a great time.
No comments:
Post a Comment