Thursday, April 10, 2014

Quality v Junk

Yesterday I had planned to ride 55 miles with 5,200 feet of climbing. 

That's a lot of climbing. 

I didn't do it. 

About 10 miles into the training I found myself loathing the thought of spending 6 or more hours on the bike, by myself. 

A week earlier I had served as a `domestique / crew' for a good friend who was attempting to do 200 miles in 12 hours.  We started riding at 6:30am on good road, cool temps and almost no wind.  By 8:AM the wind was howling.  Sand, dust, tumbleweeds flying across the road and into our face. 

I saw it my duty to serve as a windbreak for her.  First `paceline' style.  Then `echelon' style.  After 6 hours of on again off again riding, getting water, fluid, food, etc. I decided to `pack it in' and leapfrog her from my car. 

I managed to cover 97 miles during that 6 hours.  For all practical purposes it was both fast tempo and interval training the entire time. Though I was pretty beat by the end I felt really great about the `quality' of the training. 

My `domestique' experience pulled the rug out from under my excuses for avoiding `quality' training. 

So, yesterday I decided to cut my training ride short by doing a fast 35 miles with 3,600 ft of climbing: 3:00:00.  35 minutes faster than I usually do that route.  It wasn't as `painful' as I had expected. 


GETTING INTO A JUNK MILES RUT:

Laziness (and a few aspects of my temperament) has had  me doing long hours and distances on the bike for the past few years.  Here are some of the weak excuses I made for doing `junk' miles:
  • the desert is mystical, beautiful and I love the solitude;
  • if I exert too much energy on the hills I'll `blow up' and bonk;
  • the 15 or 20 lbs of weight I'm carrying needs to come off before I do any serious training;
  • my friends, associates and neighbors know me as a long-distance junkie and that appeals to my ego;
  • I'm afraid that I push to hard at my age I'll injure myself. 
This is just so much bullshit! 

These are the real reasons I do junk miles:
  • laziness. 
  • avoidance: anxiety about having to decide to invest myself in other things that may frustrate me, not be satisfying, at which I may be average;
  • worry that I'll not find anything I `like' and will be knocking around doing pointless `busy' work;
  • ego;
  • ego;
  • ego.  

TRAINING FOR QUALITY:
  • Every other day I'll train. 
  • My training will be `smart,' intense and not go on and on for hours and hours. 
  • I know I rebel against following a strict calendar plan (e.g., Tuesday, intervals, 60 minutes, etc; Wednesday, 90 minutes of tempo, etc).  So I won't set myself for predictable failure;
  • Intensity over long Zone 1 and Zone 2 slogging.

WHAT TO EXPECT:
  • Less (and better) time on the bike will confront me with more time on my hands;
  • I will invest more time in social interaction with friends, coworkers and acquaintances;
  • I will no longer be `special,' i.e., that guy who is a long-distance junkie;
  • I will experience failure more often as I work to improve my times; 
  • Failure scares me and I `catastrophize' that I will be ... not fast.  (No!  I fear that other's will be faster than me and I'll be average).
  • ego;
  • ego;
  • ego.




2 comments:

  1. The good news is, Dan, that you don't need to train huge miles to still go out and do 12hr races, or 200K, 300K, heck, even 600K brevets and permanents. You can still be that 'long distance guy' without training like that all the time. The tradeoff is, though, that the miles you DO ride have to be quality - intense enough to stimulate adaptations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree -- crucifying ourselves on the bike for hundreds of training miles is awful after a while. Personally I find the most benefit and satisfaction from spirited thirty milers with several fartlek style intervals. I used to get that from hills, but here in the flatlands it takes a lot more focus.

    ReplyDelete